Hi Emma,
I think I can answer your non-techy questions.

Arches is designed to be able to record all the types of information about a 
monument, building or site. It's based on the Core Data Standard for 
Archaeological and Architectural Sites (originally developed by CIDOC and 
published by the Council of Europe).

Within the Arches graphs the place where you would record the Condition is in 
the Condition Type (data field). This is where you store the value which is 
taken from the relevant authority document (in this case CONDITION TYPE 
AUTHORITY DOCUMENT. An authority document is simply a controlled vocabulary 
which is being used to enforce data entry. This can be a nationally recognized 
thesaurus, such as the English Heritage Thesaurus of Monument Types or the 
Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus, or it could simply be a wordlist defined 
by the user. So in this case you may want to define your own so that you had a 
simple list of 'Good', 'Fair', 'Bad'.

Where you might be confused is the use of the implied event.

The graphs are based on the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model and this is an 
event-centric model, ie. nothing can exist without the event that created it.

So an implied event is an event where the details are not necessarily recorded 
but which is need for the semantics within the model to hold true.

For example we can say that we have a site which has a condition type of 
'Good'. We know it was good on certain date (01-Jan-2014) and the implied event 
is the condition assessment which actually took place on the 1st Jan 2014.

Here though we're not recording any other information about the actual event 
(eg. who did the assessment, whether it was part of a management activity etc)  
but we could, if we wanted to, create a condition assessment Activity with all 
the relevant information which we would then link to the site/monument/building.

So in essence the implied event node (the CONDITION ASSESSMENT node) is empty 
but is used to 'semantically glue' the site to the date and type.

You can add as many condition assessments as you like to a site. The minimum 
information for the site is up to you but we would recommend at least a name, 
geometry and site type/period.

I think images are currently being looked into by the development team but I 
think it should be possible to attach one to a condition.

I've been advising the project on the use of the standards and I was 
responsible for creating the original graphs so feel free to contact me if you 
want to talk through any of this.

Regards

Phil

Phil Carlisle
Data Standards Supervisor
Data Standards Unit, Designations Department
English Heritage
The Engine House
Fire Fly Avenue
Swindon
SN2 2EH
Tel: +44 (0)1793 414824

http://thesaurus.english-heritage.org.uk/

http://www.heritagedata.org/blog/




________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Emma Cunliffe
Sent: 16 April 2014 12:22
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Arches] Condition assessments

Hi
I'm looking into options for condition assessments for sites rather than 
inventorying them specifically, and I've heard good things about ARCHES 
generally.  I noticed that the Glossary contains condition fields, but I then 
got a little unclear about how these relate to each other, and the wider 
database.

For example: what is the difference between a Node, a field and a controlled 
vocabularly?
What is an Implied Event?
Are Data Field Conditions or Information Themes Conditions fixed terms with 
clearly defined meanings, and in which case, where would I find the terms that 
can be input to see what they cover?
Can multiple condition assessments be entered in order to record changes in 
state?
Can pictures be attached to any of these fields?
Do they deal with risk?

Lastly, how much other data must be entered on the record in order for it to be 
useable?  What is the minimum that can be entered?

If this is all listed somewhere, please just point me in the right direction - 
I got myself a little confused on the website and wasn't sure where I should be 
looking!

Thank you very much for any assistance you are able to provide.
Kind regards
Dr E Cunliffe

--
-- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send 
email to [email protected]. For more information, 
visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Arches Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal 
views which are not the views of English Heritage unless specifically stated. 
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system and notify 
the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way 
nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to English Heritage may become 
publicly available.

Portico: your gateway to information on sites in the National Heritage 
Collection; have a look and tell us what you think. 
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/professional/archives-and-collections/portico/

-- 
-- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send 
email to [email protected]. For more information, 
visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Arches Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to