Hi Adam, Thank you once again for looking into my problem. I confess that I have not looked very hard at the actual graphs but at the lists in the appendices. I do think that the naming of some of these authority files/entities is confusing and needs clarification, perhaps in the user manual.
When I'm back in the office on Sunday, I will change the drop down lists around. Thank you again for your invaluable help. Lucy Sent from my iPad > On 28 Oct 2015, at 18:34, Adam Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Lucy, the main problem is that there are some semantic inconsistencies > between different pieces of the HIP. I just checked these out, and here are > the "lineages" in question. Keep in mind that the labels in the RDM are > based directly on the resource graph entity names: > > 1) > In the resource graph: > HERITAGE_RESOURCE.E18 > RESOURCE_TYPE_CLASSIFICATION.E55 > > RESOURCE_CLASSIFICATION_AUTHORITY_DOCUMENT.E32 > In the RDM: > Arches > Resource Classification > Dropdown Lists > Resource_Type_Classification.E55 > In the forms: > Resource Summary Form > Historic Resource Type > > 2) > In the resource graph: > HERITAGE_RESOURCE.E18 > PRODUCTION.E12 > PHASE_TYPE_ASSIGNMENT.E17 > > HERITAGE_RESOURCE_TYPE.E55 > HERITAGE_RESOURCE_TYPE_AUTHORITY_DOCUMENT.E32 > In the RDM: > Arches > Heritage Resource Type > Dropdown Lists > Heritage_Resource_Type.E55 > In the forms: > Classifications Form > Classification Summary (type) > > So I'd say that techincally nothing is wrong, you just found a place where, > between the graphs and the forms, some terminology is being used in a > confusing manner. If you end up digging into the forms, you could change the > names above the dropdowns with no trouble. It's definitely worth taking note > for future iterations of the HIP package. > > Adam > > > >> On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 3:03:55 AM UTC-5, Lucy FJ wrote: >> >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> I thought I'd start a new topic on this so as not to be confused with the >> other question I raised and has now been resolved. >> >> I am only using the Reference DM to change the authority files because I am >> a user and we don't have a full time IT staff member assigned to our project >> yet so can't change the files directly. >> I used the Arches HIP sample files as a basis and added our concepts for the >> heritage resource type and deleted the sample ones. I did the same for the >> resource classification types. I then added the appropriate concepts to the >> drop down lists for each. When I tried inputting a resource using the >> Resource Data manager, I found that the resource classification drop down >> list was where I expected the heritage resource list and vice versa. The >> concepts were the ones I had input. I have checked, double checked and >> triple checked my inputs and they are correct. >> I am attaching copies of the screen shots. >> >> Has anyone come across this problem before? >> >> Thank you for any help on this issue! >> >> Lucy >> >> >> > > -- > -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, > send email to [email protected]. For more > information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google > Groups "Arches Project" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/archesproject/q2FDw7fRwe8/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. For more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
