Hello all,

I'm an academic librarian from Singapore and am exploring using Arches HIP 
for Digital Humanities. Thank you for this wonderful product and the clear 
&comprehensive documentation. 

I just installed Arches HIP, and have successfully added one set of test 
data. I'm now exploring adding of relations.

In this page of the documentation 
http://arches3.readthedocs.org/en/latest/arches-data/?highlight=relations 
it was mentioned:

 The .relations file is a pipe (|) delimited text file containing the 
following column headers:


   - RESOURCEID_FROM indicates one of the two resources to be related. The 
      value here must also be present as a RESOURCEID in the .arches file.
      - RESOURCEID_TO indicates the other of the two resources to be 
      related. The value here must also be present as a RESOURCEID in the 
      .arches file.
      - START_DATE is a non-required field intended to indicate the date at 
      which a given relationship between resources began.
      - END_DATE is a non-required field intended to indicate the date at 
      which a given relationship between resources ended.
      - REALTION_TYPE is a domain value driven by an authority document 
      file calledARCHES RESOURCE CROSS-REFERENCE RELATIONSHIP TYPES.E32.csv. 
      Any value that you put into this column must be a conceptid from that 
      authority document. If you wish to customize the set of available 
      relationship types, simply modify the authority document.
      - NOTES is a non-required field into which additional text about the 
      relationship can be captured.
   
I'd like to seek some clarification:

1. How should the column headers for "ARCHES RESOURCE CROSS-REFERENCE 
RELATIONSHIP TYPES.E32.csv" look like?


2. Should "ARCHES RESOURCE CROSS-REFERENCE RELATIONSHIP TYPES.E32.csv" be 
located in the "source_data\concepts\authority_files"?

3. Does each entry in "ARCHES RESOURCE CROSS-REFERENCE RELATIONSHIP 
TYPES.E32.csv" need to be mapped to a domain node via 
"ENTITY_TYPE_X_ADOC.csv"?

4. Is it accurate to say that, in order to conform to the CIDOC CRM 
ontology, a "relation" (in context of Arches HIP) should be mapped to a 
domain node that is a CIDOC CRM "Property"?


Thank you for your time!

Best wishes,
yikang
 

-- 
-- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send 
email to [email protected]. For more information, 
visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Arches Project" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to