Hi Yikang, glad to hear you were able to get Arches up and running. The simple answer is that just like a value for NAME_TYPE.E55 in the .arches file must correspond to a conceptid in the NAME_TYPE_AUTHORITY_DOCUMENT.E32, a RELATION_TYPE in the .relations file must correspond to a relationship type that is defined in the relationship type authority document. If you loaded the sample authority documents from Arches-HIP, then you have already loaded the file in question, and it looks like you've found an error in the documentation. Here's the file <https://bitbucket.org/arches/hip/src/8d3ec0e6643d11c2606992f4c7ed80d912acd3d5/arches_hip/source_data/sample_data/concepts/sample_authority_files/ARCHES%20RESOURCE%20CROSS-REFERENCE%20RELATIONSHIP%20TYPES.E32.csv?at=default&fileviewer=file-view-default>, so it looks like it's just mislabeled in the directions that you referenced. I'll update that...
So to answer your questions specifically: 1) conceptid,PrefLabel,AltLabels,ParentConceptid,ConceptType,Provider (see linked example above) 2) Yes, and it is already included in the HIP authority files, but it is named ARCHES RESOURCE CROSS-REFERENCE RELATIONSHIP TYPES.E32.csv 3) No, you just need this single line in the ENTITY_TYPE_X_ADOC.csv (shown in red below): entitytype,authoritydoc,authoritydocconceptscheme ARCHES_RESOURCE_CROSS-REFERENCE_RELATIONSHIP_TYPES.E55,ARCHES RESOURCE CROSS-REFERENCE RELATIONSHIP TYPES.E32.csv,yourconceptschemename 4) No, the "properties" referenced in the CIDOC CRM are connections between nodes within a single instance of a resource (as you can see in the resource graphs). The "relations" that are defined in the .relations file are connections between different resource instances. If you open the HERITAGE_RESOURCE.E18 resource graph and the ACTOR.E39 resource graph, you could imagine a "relation" as a line between the central nodes of each graph. Hope that makes sense. Adam On Friday, December 18, 2015 at 3:56:09 AM UTC-6, YK Feng wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'm an academic librarian from Singapore and am exploring using Arches HIP > for Digital Humanities. Thank you for this wonderful product and the clear > &comprehensive documentation. > > I just installed Arches HIP, and have successfully added one set of test > data. I'm now exploring adding of relations. > > In this page of the documentation > http://arches3.readthedocs.org/en/latest/arches-data/?highlight=relations > it was mentioned: > > The .relations file is a pipe (|) delimited text file containing the > following column headers: > > > - RESOURCEID_FROM indicates one of the two resources to be related. > The value here must also be present as a RESOURCEID in the .arches > file. > - RESOURCEID_TO indicates the other of the two resources to be > related. The value here must also be present as a RESOURCEID in the > .arches file. > - START_DATE is a non-required field intended to indicate the date > at which a given relationship between resources began. > - END_DATE is a non-required field intended to indicate the date at > which a given relationship between resources ended. > - REALTION_TYPE is a domain value driven by an authority document > file calledARCHES RESOURCE CROSS-REFERENCE RELATIONSHIP > TYPES.E32.csv. Any value that you put into this column must be a > conceptid from that authority document. If you wish to customize > the set of available relationship types, simply modify the > authority document. > - NOTES is a non-required field into which additional text about > the relationship can be captured. > > I'd like to seek some clarification: > > 1. How should the column headers for "ARCHES RESOURCE CROSS-REFERENCE > RELATIONSHIP TYPES.E32.csv" look like? > > > 2. Should "ARCHES RESOURCE CROSS-REFERENCE RELATIONSHIP TYPES.E32.csv" be > located in the "source_data\concepts\authority_files"? > > 3. Does each entry in "ARCHES RESOURCE CROSS-REFERENCE RELATIONSHIP > TYPES.E32.csv" need to be mapped to a domain node via > "ENTITY_TYPE_X_ADOC.csv"? > > 4. Is it accurate to say that, in order to conform to the CIDOC CRM > ontology, a "relation" (in context of Arches HIP) should be mapped to a > domain node that is a CIDOC CRM "Property"? > > > Thank you for your time! > > Best wishes, > yikang > > -- -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. For more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
