Dear Seta, At the Getty, we are starting work on the use of Arches as a platform for managing at least basic bibliographic descriptions in order to update and integrate the AATA online database[1]. As you can see, it definitely needs that update!
Is there a particular reason why you wouldn't just describe the bibliographic references in Arches itself? Thanks! Rob [1] http://aata.getty.edu/Home On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 6:19 AM, Seta S <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone! > > We are thinking of using Arches for our database of archaeological sites > and areas. One of the database fields would also contain bibliographic > references. To avoid using plain text as the field type, is there a way of > linking an online bibliographic database system (such as Zotero or > Mendeley) with an Arches-based database? If so, which system would be best > to use for such linking? > > Thanks! > > -- > -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, > send email to [email protected]. For more > information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Arches Project" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Rob Sanderson Semantic Architect The Getty Trust Los Angeles, CA 90049 -- -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. For more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
