Hi Seta.
To answer your question and to add a little to what Rob mentioned below. You can already record what you refer to as basic bibliographic data in Arches, and relate those references to archeological sites, for example. And different languages should not be a problem. As Rob mentioned, we have started the preliminary work to build a bibliographic module for Arches, which will likely not be completed for another 18-months or so. It will initially be used to manage and publish the abstracting and indexing data produced by AATA Online (aata.getty.edu). To be clear, though, it is not being built, initially at least, with a view towards *producing* *publications*, so your requirement for "different automatic citation style options," for example, may not be included. Something like that, however, could certainly be added by someone in the community once the ground development work is done. Best for now, Alison On Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 1:20:19 AM UTC-7, Seta S wrote: > > Dear Rob, > > thanks for your answer! I have to say, I do not have much insight on what > is all possible in Arches, because we have not used it so far. However, our > bibliography is partly what you might call basic, but many of them are also > rather specific (and not in English), so I don´t know how interesting it > would be for AATA? > > What we really need is a bibliographic database for our project (with > everything that comes with such a database - tagging with keywords, Word > extension and different automatic citation style options..), because we > would like to use it also when we are writing publications. The second > thing we will need is an archaeological site database for which we would > like to use Arches. However, also this site database should include some > bibliographic references. Therefore, the idea was to bring this two > together, and my question is, how we could best do this? Or can we do all > of the above directly with Arches? > > Thank you again! > Best, > Seta > > On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 9:39:30 PM UTC+2, Robert Sanderson wrote: >> >> >> Dear Seta, >> >> At the Getty, we are starting work on the use of Arches as a platform for >> managing at least basic bibliographic descriptions in order to update and >> integrate the AATA online database[1]. As you can see, it definitely needs >> that update! >> >> Is there a particular reason why you wouldn't just describe the >> bibliographic references in Arches itself? >> >> Thanks! >> >> Rob >> >> [1] http://aata.getty.edu/Home >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 6:19 AM, Seta S <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone! >>> >>> We are thinking of using Arches for our database of archaeological sites >>> and areas. One of the database fields would also contain bibliographic >>> references. To avoid using plain text as the field type, is there a way of >>> linking an online bibliographic database system (such as Zotero or >>> Mendeley) with an Arches-based database? If so, which system would be best >>> to use for such linking? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> -- >>> -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, >>> send email to [email protected]. For more information, >>> visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Arches Project" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Rob Sanderson >> Semantic Architect >> The Getty Trust >> Los Angeles, CA 90049 >> > -- -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. For more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
