Many thanks for the detailed answers and sorry for the late replay. We want to do exactly that Phil Carlisle. For now we will stick to simple resource-resource relation and not migrate to v4.1
Best regards, Venci Pirinski On Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 8:24:48 PM UTC+2, Vencislav Pirinski wrote: > > Hello, > My name is Ventsislav Pirinski and I am from the Bulgarian Academy of > Sciences. > We would like to integrate Arches in bulgarian museums and we are working > in close collaboration with some museums and heritage institutions. We want > to show the capabilities of Arches with a sample project. We have working > implementation of Arches 4.0. > The project is about type of tombs, dolmens. We have created Resource > model called "Dolmens" and modified it to suit our needs, but we want to > relate it to a more general model. > Something like this "Heritage resource model" -> "Archaeological site > model" -> "Tombs model" -> "Dolmens model". > We want to use a standard like CRM CIDOC for this relation. > Can this be done natively in Arches? > > Also we want to have partial translation in Bulgarian for the reports. We > know that the sections can not be translated, we are concerned only about > the translation of the data. What advice would you give me for the > implementation? > > Best regards, > Vencislav Pirinski > -- -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. For more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
