Thanks, Alan. It's a fair point about DocPad integration, and it's really good to have an idea of how well each might work with its replacement. I only see Fuse in the example you shared, but a quick search brought me to the relevant page in the Hugo docs <https://gohugo.io/tools/search/>, and there are certainly options for either Fuse.js or Lunr.js (that page links to the page you shared, BTW).
Cheers, Tony On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 19:02, Harnum, Alan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tony, > > > > Thank you for this summary – as discussed in the channel yesterday, I > personally don’t consider DocPad integration to be a compelling reason for > a particular solution. Philosophically speaking, the last few years of > experience has made me distrustful of plugin-style architectures for static > site generation (this is very coloured by the recent DocPad struggles). > > > > There are a few examples of integrating both Fuse and Lunr with Hugo (the > direction the IDRC has been going lately for static sites) here that may > usefully inform this discussion: > https://gist.github.com/eddiewebb/735feb48f50f0ddd65ae5606a1cb41ae > > > > *From: *fluid-work <[email protected]> on behalf of > Tony Atkins <[email protected]> > *Date: *Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 10:45 AM > *To: *"[email protected] Architecture" < > [email protected]>, Fluid Work <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Evaluating options for static site searching. > > > > Hi, All. > > > > This week I took a few minutes to evaluate a few options for searching > static sites (like the Infusion documentation) and wrote up my experiences > as a technology evaluation on the GPII wiki: > > > > https://wiki.gpii.net/w/Technology_Evaluation_-_Static_Site_Search > > > > As this issue affects both the Fluid community and the GPII architecture > that is largely built using Infusion, I'm cross-posting to the > gpii-architecture and fluid-work mailing lists to get input from both > communities. If you are at all interested in the topic, I'd appreciate it > if you'd take a few minutes to review the evaluation and send your feedback. > > > > If there is enough interest, I am happy to put together a one-off meeting > to discuss. > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Tony >
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gpii.net/mailman/listinfo/architecture
