On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe <[email protected]> wrote:
> This should be the highest priority other than the data mapping work we > are doing in the tooling space. > > I think, the most productive is to go about this with user story > implementations. Else, it is so hard to surface real bugs. > > WDYT? > User stories will be a good way test the usability. IMO, graphical editor works pretty well in the happy path, but when user tries to do something strange then its failing apart. > > If we are in agreement, can we figure out some projects that we should > carry out to cover this ground? > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Kasun Indrasiri <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The graphical editor for ESB has improved quite a lot, but still there >> are a lot of cases that we need to improve the user experience perspective. >> So, I think we need to focus on stabilization of the editor and giving a >> smooth user experience with designing of message flows. Almost all the ESB >> features are supported with the latest Dev Studio 3.2.0, so this will be a >> good point to concentrate on the $subject. I think all ESB folks should own >> this and help the tooling team to improve it. >> >> >> -- >> Kasun Indrasiri >> Software Architect >> WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com >> lean.enterprise.middleware >> >> cell: +94 71 536 4128 >> Blog : http://kasunpanorama.blogspot.com/ >> > > > > -- > > Thanks, > Samisa... > > Samisa Abeysinghe > VP Engineering > WSO2 Inc. > http://wso2.com > http://wso2.org > -- Kasun Indrasiri Software Architect WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com lean.enterprise.middleware cell: +94 71 536 4128 Blog : http://kasunpanorama.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
