On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Jasintha Dasanayake <[email protected]>wrote:
> +1 for stabilizing the ESB graphical editor. > > If we can get the QA team support for this it would be great > The problem is that QA team does not compose of developers. This tool needs to be tested by developers. > > Thanks and regards > /Jasintha > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Harshana Martin <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Kasun, >> >> There is a good reason for it! Before releasing the initial version in >> DevS 3.0.0, we have tested the editor with all ESB samples. This has fixed >> most of the happy path issues. >> >> So IMO the remaining testing scenarios should be focusing more on real >> world scenarios. >> >> Also non happy path issues will be revealed if we can give the tool to a >> new employee who has no OR basic idea on ESB. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Thanks and Regards, >> Harshana >> >> Sent from my Galaxy S II >> On 16 Jul 2013 01:34, "Kasun Indrasiri" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Samisa Abeysinghe <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> This should be the highest priority other than the data mapping work we >>>> are doing in the tooling space. >>>> >>>> I think, the most productive is to go about this with user story >>>> implementations. Else, it is so hard to surface real bugs. >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>>> >>> User stories will be a good way test the usability. IMO, graphical >>> editor works pretty well in the happy path, but when user tries to do >>> something strange then its failing apart. >>> >>>> >>>> If we are in agreement, can we figure out some projects that we should >>>> carry out to cover this ground? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Kasun Indrasiri <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> The graphical editor for ESB has improved quite a lot, but still there >>>>> are a lot of cases that we need to improve the user experience >>>>> perspective. >>>>> So, I think we need to focus on stabilization of the editor and giving a >>>>> smooth user experience with designing of message flows. Almost all the ESB >>>>> features are supported with the latest Dev Studio 3.2.0, so this will be a >>>>> good point to concentrate on the $subject. I think all ESB folks should >>>>> own >>>>> this and help the tooling team to improve it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Kasun Indrasiri >>>>> Software Architect >>>>> WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com >>>>> lean.enterprise.middleware >>>>> >>>>> cell: +94 71 536 4128 >>>>> Blog : http://kasunpanorama.blogspot.com/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Samisa... >>>> >>>> Samisa Abeysinghe >>>> VP Engineering >>>> WSO2 Inc. >>>> http://wso2.com >>>> http://wso2.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Kasun Indrasiri >>> Software Architect >>> WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com >>> lean.enterprise.middleware >>> >>> cell: +94 71 536 4128 >>> Blog : http://kasunpanorama.blogspot.com/ >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Architecture mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture >> >> > > > -- > *Jasintha Dasanayake > **Software Engineer > WSO2 Inc. | http://wso2.com > lean . enterprise . middleware* > * > * > *mobile :- 077 291 6596* > > _______________________________________________ > Architecture mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture > > -- Thanks, Samisa... Samisa Abeysinghe VP Engineering WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com http://wso2.org
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
