On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Pradeep Fernando <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All, > > Right now, we mainly use svn based depsync in our product clusters. In > order to use svn depsync capability, we have to point to an external svn > server. > > Running a separate server instance to cluster our products is not viable > in some instances. > > Proposed approach, > > - use Git as the primary platform artifact syncup repository. > - pack a git server in products, (gitblit ?) - again this can be feature > installation or server profile thing - open for discussion. > - manager node starts up the git server. > - we can point to an external git server as well. > - we have to think about the security aspect as well - close integration > with our userstores. > +1 for using Git as the primary DepSync mechanism. SVN clients had issues from time to time. > > > > ** We are going to retire registry based depsync from here onwards. > Is this agreed upon? Considerable effort was put into Reg based depsync because it was argued that some people may not like running another type of server (SVN/Git) > > thanks, > --Pradeep > > > -- *Afkham Azeez* Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/ * <http://www.apache.org/>** email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>* cell: +94 77 3320919 blog: **http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>* twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez> * linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez* * * *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
