Mohan, our wizard assumes lot and it does not direct me to exactly what I need to do next. For example, when I go to wizard, to add a query I need a stream, before that I need a builder .. but nothing tells me I should have created a builder first.
> I'm -1 for the idea of in-line formatters/builders, this is because it > will enable users to create same formatters multiple times and that will > reduce the performance at the execution, & it will also make the config > language and the whole stream flow much complex and unmaintainable. > E.g what happens it i defines an in-line formatter to Foo Stream, if a > another plan outputs Foo will it be also using this?? & etc > >> >> Suho, if we ask users to define the stream first (via stream UI .. or within a wizard that embed stream UIs), and then ask them to define the mapping (builder or formatter) separately, I think then there is no problem. Even if user end up defining the formatter twice, I think there will be no real overhead. Did I miss something? Note currently we define the stream as side effect of defining a builder. --Srinath
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
