On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Srinath Perera <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mohan, our wizard assumes lot and it does not direct me to exactly what I > need to do next. For example, when I go to wizard, to add a query I need a > stream, before that I need a builder .. but nothing tells me I should have > created a builder first. > Absolute +1. My experience with CEP was the same, you as a new user kind of get lost, till you write the first end-to-end scenario. > > >> I'm -1 for the idea of in-line formatters/builders, this is because it >> will enable users to create same formatters multiple times and that will >> reduce the performance at the execution, & it will also make the config >> language and the whole stream flow much complex and unmaintainable. >> E.g what happens it i defines an in-line formatter to Foo Stream, if a >> another plan outputs Foo will it be also using this?? & etc >> >>> >>> Suho, if we ask users to define the stream first (via stream UI .. or > within a wizard that embed stream UIs), and then ask them to define the > mapping (builder or formatter) separately, I think then there is no > problem. Even if user end up defining the formatter twice, I think there > will be no real overhead. Did I miss something? Note currently we define > the stream as side effect of defining a builder. > > --Srinath > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Architecture mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture > > -- Thanks & regards, Nirmal Senior Software Engineer- Platform Technologies Team, WSO2 Inc. Mobile: +94715779733 Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
