Hi Venura,

Yes you are correct. I've had a misunderstanding. Thanks.

Regards
Dulanja.


On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Venura Kahawala <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Dulanja,
>
> AFAIK if we use TLS, message will be encrypted and only the server will be
> able to decrypt the message since TLS key is shared between only the client
> (browser) and server. This is because at the time of symmetric key
> exchange, client encrypt the key with the server's public key and send that
> to the server . Anyway we are not going to use request redirection but a
> POST request.
>
>
> Regards,
> Venura
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Dulanja Liyanage <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Ah, but i guess the jaggery app and the Authentication Framework would be
>> in the same machine, then this won't be a prob if we use LAN address for
>> the POST
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Dulanja Liyanage <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> The problem of sending a POST outside of the internal network is anyone
>>> can grab the credentials during wire transfer (if not secured with HTTPS)
>>> or at transits (even if secured with HTTPS). Then we need to consider about
>>> encryption.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Johann Nallathamby <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Venura,
>>>>
>>>> This should be done using the application authentication framework we
>>>> have. As we will be migrating our carbon authenticators also to this it is
>>>> best to use this framework.
>>>>
>>>> All you need to do is get the username and password of the user (if you
>>>> are using Basic Authentication) and do a POST to the commonauth servlet.
>>>> This way the authentication mechanism is independent from your webapp. Only
>>>> thing is currently we don't have an authenticator that calls the IS
>>>> webservice APIs for authentication. This could be easily done by writing a
>>>> new authenticator. Curently we have a Basic Auth authenticator which
>>>> authenticates with the underlying user store and a SAML SSO authenticator
>>>> for doing Single-Sign-On.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Venura Kahawala <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm now implementing the log in functionality for the My-Identity app.
>>>>> As per my understanding current user management functionality implemented
>>>>> within jaggery uses OSGI services. This is correct if the mentioned
>>>>> application is only deployed within the IS server and therefore 
>>>>> my-identity
>>>>> app is connected to the same user store as the IS. But if we deploy the
>>>>> application within an AS, the scenario might be different.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is also acceptable if the AS and IS both connects to the same
>>>>> user store. But in some scenarios  these two server might not be connected
>>>>> to the same user store.
>>>>> For example, IS and user store is located within the internal network
>>>>> while AS is located outside the internal network and AS is not connected 
>>>>> to
>>>>> the internal user store. But still we need to deploy the my-identity app
>>>>> within the AS since this application is exposed to the end users.
>>>>>
>>>>> If we need our application to cater above requirement we need to
>>>>> implement the log in functionality using web services.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Venura
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Venura Kahawala <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are in the process of moving the below UI features out from the IS
>>>>>> management console.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. My Profiles
>>>>>> 2. Account Recovery
>>>>>> 3. My Authorized apps
>>>>>> 4. OpenID
>>>>>> 5. My SCIM Providers
>>>>>> 6. Multifactor Authentication
>>>>>> 7. Sign-up
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A jaggery application will be implemented with the above mentioned
>>>>>> features and deployed within IS server. This application can be accessed
>>>>>> via a different port. High level architecture diagram can be seen here 
>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jaggery application will be implemented ad-hearing to the caramel
>>>>>> framework.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/a/wso2.com/drawings/d/1jQsKbSVnH3cHCKkNjaLqr9cBARk0pD04RLPGgid4R7M/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please share your thoughts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Venura
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mobile: +94 71 82 300 20
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>>>
>>>>> Mobile: +94 71 82 300 20
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks & Regards,
>>>>
>>>> *Johann Dilantha Nallathamby*
>>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>> Integration Technologies Team
>>>>  WSO2, Inc.
>>>> lean.enterprise.middleware
>>>>
>>>> Mobile - *+94777776950*
>>>> Blog - *http://nallaa.wordpress.com*
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dulanja Liyanage
>>> Senior Software Engineer - WSO2 Inc.
>>> M: +94776764717
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dulanja Liyanage
>> Senior Software Engineer - WSO2 Inc.
>> M: +94776764717
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Senior Software Engineer
>
> Mobile: +94 71 82 300 20
>
>


-- 
Dulanja Liyanage
Senior Software Engineer - WSO2 Inc.
M: +94776764717
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to