Hi Venura, In my mind we are defining logically the same service provider with two different protocols. Therefore the resources/permissions should be for that service provider regardless of protocol being used.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Venura Kahawala <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Currently an entry in IDN_APPMGT_APP table can have multiple sub entries. > For example one SAML SP and OAuth client, these both can exists under one > root application. > > Under custom permission feature we might need to have custom permissions > for each application. For example for one SP might need set of different > custom permissions and other OAuth client which is under the same root > application might need set of different permissions. If we define resources > for root application, then the resources might get confused among > applications. > > Aren't we supposed to consider one SP/ OAuth client as one single > application or are we defining the same SP with two different protocols > (SAML and OAuth)? If we are defining the same SP with different protocols > then this is okay, but if not we might need to change the IDN_APPMGT_APP > table. > > Regards, > Venura > > -- > Senior Software Engineer > > Mobile: +94 71 82 300 20 > > -- Thanks & Regards, *Johann Dilantha Nallathamby* Senior Software Engineer Integration Technologies Team WSO2, Inc. lean.enterprise.middleware Mobile - *+94777776950* Blog - *http://nallaa.wordpress.com <http://nallaa.wordpress.com>*
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
