Hi Johann, Thanks for the clarification.
Regards, Venura On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Johann Nallathamby <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Venura, > > In my mind we are defining logically the same service provider with two > different protocols. Therefore the resources/permissions should be for that > service provider regardless of protocol being used. > > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Venura Kahawala <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Currently an entry in IDN_APPMGT_APP table can have multiple sub entries. >> For example one SAML SP and OAuth client, these both can exists under one >> root application. >> >> Under custom permission feature we might need to have custom permissions >> for each application. For example for one SP might need set of different >> custom permissions and other OAuth client which is under the same root >> application might need set of different permissions. If we define resources >> for root application, then the resources might get confused among >> applications. >> >> Aren't we supposed to consider one SP/ OAuth client as one single >> application or are we defining the same SP with two different protocols >> (SAML and OAuth)? If we are defining the same SP with different protocols >> then this is okay, but if not we might need to change the IDN_APPMGT_APP >> table. >> >> Regards, >> Venura >> >> -- >> Senior Software Engineer >> >> Mobile: +94 71 82 300 20 >> >> > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > > *Johann Dilantha Nallathamby* > Senior Software Engineer > Integration Technologies Team > WSO2, Inc. > lean.enterprise.middleware > > Mobile - *+94777776950* > Blog - *http://nallaa.wordpress.com <http://nallaa.wordpress.com>* > -- Senior Software Engineer Mobile: +94 71 82 300 20
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
