Hi,
After discussing the issues when implementing configurable life cycle
stages, finally we agreed on followings.
- To have 3 preconfigured lifecycles with following stages.
1. prod only
2. dev and prod
3. dev, test and prod
-After creating the app user can assign one life cycle to the app from the
interface provided [1].
-The implementation will include followings [2].
[1]
https://docs.google.com/a/wso2.com/drawings/d/1-wwZf-4fB9ha6ETJ3ZzO78olVY1rG0GfjqL0kn-NN0o/edit?usp=sharing
[2]
https://docs.google.com/a/wso2.com/document/d/102O0hCwlXd0td2edJ1MBs-Tf9CvMKkf5Grr4ZARyJCc/edit?usp=sharing
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Shall we have a preconfigured set of lifecycle? For example something as
> below,
>
> sc1.xml - prod only
> sc2.xml - dev test prod
> sc3.xml - test prod
>
> So in that way people associate the correct lifecycle xml based on the UI
> element the person picks.
>
> thanks,
> dimuthu
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> IMO, we should only let the people add dev and test stages, and by
>>> default apps should have production stage only (as discussed in strategy).
>>> So yes we need to redo the UI to be better (only to add dev and test).
>>>
>>
>> But the backend must be completely configurable.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> dimuthu
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Amila Maha Arachchi <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Question to AF team:
>>>> At the moment, there is a runtime associated with each lifecycle stage.
>>>> i.e. Dev for Dev, Test for Test etc. This is not going to change, right? My
>>>> concern is, when a user adds a new stage, how are we going to provide the
>>>> runtime for it? In the public cloud scenario, we have pre-defined
>>>> runtimes/stages. When this new UI/Feature rolls out, how is it going to
>>>> work in the cloud?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne <[email protected]
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> IMO, we need to simplify app creation as much as possible to make it
>>>>> user friendly.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> dimuthu
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Manjula Rathnayake <[email protected]
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Bimali,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regarding the attached flow,
>>>>>> Instead of adding more stages while creating the application, can we
>>>>>> enable a page to define life cycle configurations. Then at the time of
>>>>>> application creation, user can select one of those life cycle
>>>>>> configurations. The advantage over what you have suggested is that we can
>>>>>> reuse life cycle configurations for multiple apps and we can govern who
>>>>>> can
>>>>>> define life cycle configurations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thank you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Bimali Dayananda <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Currently in the AppFactory there are three stages called
>>>>>>> Development, Testing and Production for a life cycle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Problem:
>>>>>>> The users who create applications can use only the predefined
>>>>>>> stages.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Solution:
>>>>>>> Let the user to decide life cycle stages in each application or
>>>>>>> else they can use the default life cycle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Below attachments are the rough sketches of flow diagram and the
>>>>>>> interface design I have planned for the task.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your comments and suggestions are highly valued.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Bimali Dayananda
>>>>>>> Intern-Software Engineering
>>>>>>> Mobile : +94(77) 571 6618
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Manjula Rathnayaka
>>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>>> WSO2, Inc.
>>>>>> Mobile:+94 77 743 1987
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dimuthu Leelarathne
>>>>> Director & Product Lead of App Factory
>>>>>
>>>>> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
>>>>> email: [email protected]
>>>>> Mobile : 0773661935
>>>>>
>>>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Amila Maharachchi*
>>>> Senior Technical Lead
>>>> WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>
>>>> Blog: http://maharachchi.blogspot.com
>>>> Mobile: +94719371446
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dimuthu Leelarathne
>>> Director & Product Lead of App Factory
>>>
>>> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
>>> email: [email protected]
>>> Mobile : 0773661935
>>>
>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dimuthu Leelarathne
>> Director & Product Lead of App Factory
>>
>> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
>> email: [email protected]
>> Mobile : 0773661935
>>
>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dimuthu Leelarathne
> Director & Product Lead of App Factory
>
> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
> email: [email protected]
> Mobile : 0773661935
>
> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
>
--
Bimali Dayananda
Intern-Software Engineering
Mobile : +94(77) 571 6618
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
