On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Manuranga Perera <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Sagara, > > Can agree with everything except following > >> DS has to provide those improvements. > > Just to rephrase what I said, We decided to go with DS, now the problem is whether we can deliver same level of usability, appearance, look and feel as old AS dashboard, if possible then we all good but if not possible means we are downgrading usability and I can't agree on that. If later one is the case we only have two options, 1. Like old dashboard go with some customizations 2. Improve DS to support those features - Here don't think it in technical sense, I'm not asking to support 'hierarchical menu' or anything like that instead we consciously used 'hierarchical menu' to provide certain usability aspects as far as we can keep same usability aspects we can change underline technology but if DS can't cater same level of usability aspects then it should treat as user requirement and provide a viable solution. Thanks ! > > I can understand the time construction that may be applicable to the > current situation, but it's not good to think like this in general. > > > -- > With regards, > *Manu*ranga Perera. > > phone : 071 7 70 20 50 > mail : [email protected] > -- Sagara Gunathunga Architect; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com V.P Apache Web Services; http://ws.apache.org/ Linkedin; http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara Blog ; http://ssagara.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
