On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't think we should use Axiom. It probably will be put into the attic
> in the near future. It is not actively maintained. In the rest of the new
> C5 based platform, we have avoided using Axiom/Axis2. Not a good choice for
> something we are building for the future.
>

Yeah.. That's the problem with Axiom.But we did not find a better
alternative yet.we are looking for  a better one.


>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Isuru Ranawaka <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nandika,
>>
>> yes .we choose Axiom has default soap processing library because it
>> supports  differed building and uses StAx API for processing XML events
>> and  XPath support . Seems it is matured library for handling SOAP .
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Nandika Jayawardana <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Isuru,
>>>
>>> So the XML processing library will be Axiom right.  +1 for axiom since
>>> its very comprehensive when it comes to soap processing.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> NAndika
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Isuru Ranawaka <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jochen,
>>>>
>>>> Your suggestion is very interesting and thanks for providing  a
>>>> valuable idea. Actually we are in the process of  designing error handling
>>>> in CGW and need to think about error handling strategies like,   Per
>>>> exception based error handling, Mediation level error handling , Pipeline
>>>> level error handling ,  Global level error handling etc .. and how to fit
>>>> them with Next GEN ESB Language and runtime.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Isuru
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Jochen Traunecker <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Isuru,
>>>>>
>>>>> have you considered some kind of robust "Fallback-Reader" capable of
>>>>> reading whatever comes in as binary raw data? It might be very handy in
>>>>> error handling like illegal characters in XML payloads, wrong encoding of
>>>>> payloads, malformed payloads and so on.
>>>>>
>>>>> A typical scenario is like this: a illegal payload ends up in some
>>>>> fault-handler ( e.g. XML parser throws an exception). Fault-Handling 
>>>>> should
>>>>> be able to process the illegal payload like encoding it as Base64 
>>>>> compliant
>>>>> text and write it to the log-file and so on. By that Fault-Handling should
>>>>> be able to access the payload as binary data stream through
>>>>> "Fallback-Reader". Ideally "Fallback-Reader" provides convenience
>>>>> functionality like base64 encoding, compressing, ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Jochen
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jochen Traunecker
>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/jochen-traunecker
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Isuru Ranawaka <[email protected]> schrieb am Di., 14. Juni 2016 um
>>>>> 19:27 Uhr:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have identified three scenarios when considering content aware
>>>>>> support in Next Gen ESB . These can be categorized as  a pure pass thru
>>>>>> scenario where payload is  not touched , reading the  content without
>>>>>> modifying  scenario and reading and modifying the content. So we came up 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> initial design  and implementation of the content reading part. We have
>>>>>> come up with  different message readers for different content types .  
>>>>>> For
>>>>>> example,  for the XML message  XMLReader is used and for the JSON 
>>>>>> Messages
>>>>>> JSONReader is used. Message readers are pluggable via OSGI service.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [image: reader_implementation.png]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reader Registration
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Gateway core consists of in memory registry which keeps
>>>>>>    registered MessageReaders according to content type.
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Message readers are registered via OSGI  services.
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    JSON message reader and XML message reader are implemented as two
>>>>>>    different OSGI bundles.
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    CarbonMessage is supported with reading content as InputStream
>>>>>>    and write content via OutputStream.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Message Flow
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Need to specify the portion of the message that needs to be  read
>>>>>>    via XPath or JSONPath according to  the  content type.
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     When message hits the content aware mediator it checks weather
>>>>>>    message is already read if so then it takes MessageDataSource which 
>>>>>> is data
>>>>>>    holder for already read message inputstream according 
>>>>>> contentType.Else it
>>>>>>    gets the matching reader from reader registry and read the input 
>>>>>> stream and
>>>>>>    load the inputstream into MessageDataSource.
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    XPath and JSONPath are evaluated using MessageDataSource
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Serialize data from MessageDataSource to CarbonMessage before
>>>>>>    sending to the transport level after mediation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> XML Reading
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Axiom is used for represent XML messages as OMElements
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Axiom uses StAX API for read and write XML messages which is
>>>>>>    inherently supports deferred building concept.
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    AxiomXpath is used for evaluate XPath and it used Jaxen as
>>>>>>    underlying XPath library.
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    XPath libraries are pluggable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JSON Reading
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Jayway library is used for represent JSONPath.
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Underlying JSON library is Jackson.
>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    Jackson has JSONParser and JSONGenerator which are similar to
>>>>>>    StreamingXMLReader and Writer in StAX API and can read,  write events 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>    streaming manner.
>>>>>>    - Jackson supports data binding as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best Regards
>>>>>> Isuru Ranawaka
>>>>>> M: +94714629880
>>>>>> Blog : http://isurur.blogspot.com/
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> Isuru Ranawaka
>>>> M: +94714629880
>>>> Blog : http://isurur.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Nandika Jayawardana
>>> WSO2 Inc ; http://wso2.com
>>> lean.enterprise.middleware
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Architecture mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>> Isuru Ranawaka
>> M: +94714629880
>> Blog : http://isurur.blogspot.com/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Architecture mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Afkham Azeez*
> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
> * <http://www.apache.org/>*
> *email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>
> * cell: +94 77 3320919 <%2B94%2077%203320919>blog: *
> *http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>
> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*
> <http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
> *linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>*
>
> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
>


-- 
Best Regards
Isuru Ranawaka
M: +94714629880
Blog : http://isurur.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to