For IS 6.0.0 M3 we decided to implement and manage user lifecycle states. For IS 6.0.0 M2 we are implementing SCIM 2.0. I propose that we extend SCIM 2.0 metadata and include the user lifecycle state as a user's metadata.
Also regarding where we need to store this metadata, I think it needs to be stored in a column in the UM_USER table. This means we don't have to go to the identity store to fetch user's state for most of the operations we will be performing on the user. On a different note I think we also need to merge the SCIM2.0 metadata table with UM_USER table so that all SCIM 2.0 metadata is supported by our identity-mgt implementation. This will greatly improve performance and avoid multiple lookups in database. Similarly we must use UM_GROUP to store group metadata of SCIM 2.0. -- Thanks & Regards, *Johann Dilantha Nallathamby* Technical Lead & Product Lead of WSO2 Identity Server Governance Technologies Team WSO2, Inc. lean.enterprise.middleware Mobile - *+94777776950* Blog - *http://nallaa.wordpress.com <http://nallaa.wordpress.com>*
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
