On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Isura Karunaratne <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Johann, > > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Johann Nallathamby <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> For IS 6.0.0 M3 we decided to implement and manage user lifecycle states. >> For IS 6.0.0 M2 we are implementing SCIM 2.0. I propose that we extend SCIM >> 2.0 metadata and include the user lifecycle state as a user's metadata. >> >> Also regarding where we need to store this metadata, I think it needs to >> be stored in a column in the UM_USER table. This means we don't have to go >> to the identity store to fetch user's state for most of the operations we >> will be performing on the user. >> >> Should we store state and lifecycleId in UM_USER table or IDM_USER table ? > Sorry it should be IDM_USER. This will be irrespective of underlying identity store type. > > Thanks > Isura > > > >> On a different note I think we also need to merge the SCIM2.0 metadata >> table with UM_USER table so that all SCIM 2.0 metadata is supported by our >> identity-mgt implementation. This will greatly improve performance and >> avoid multiple lookups in database. Similarly we must use UM_GROUP to store >> group metadata of SCIM 2.0. >> >> -- >> Thanks & Regards, >> >> *Johann Dilantha Nallathamby* >> Technical Lead & Product Lead of WSO2 Identity Server >> Governance Technologies Team >> WSO2, Inc. >> lean.enterprise.middleware >> >> Mobile - *+94777776950* >> Blog - *http://nallaa.wordpress.com <http://nallaa.wordpress.com>* >> > > -- Thanks & Regards, *Johann Dilantha Nallathamby* Technical Lead & Product Lead of WSO2 Identity Server Governance Technologies Team WSO2, Inc. lean.enterprise.middleware Mobile - *+94777776950* Blog - *http://nallaa.wordpress.com <http://nallaa.wordpress.com>*
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
