On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 5:10 PM Sanjeewa Malalgoda <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Can you create document explaining this feature in detail with possible
> user scenarios. It would be great if we can have some test artifacts as
> well.
>

+1. Let's create a GDoc and share please.

>
> Thanks,
> sanjeewa.
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 3:38 PM Varuni Punchihewa <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sanjeewa,
>>
>> There's no effect to ballerina filters from setting the http version to
>> 2.0. But the connection established via the client and the microgateway and
>> microgateway with the backend would be more efficient and fast due to the
>> features like header compression, it's full multiplexed nature etc.
>> Furthermore, we won't be using the server push feature in the microgateway
>> since there's no much use cases of it with the microgateway.
>>
>> Thank you
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> *Varuni Punchihewa*
>> Intern - Software Engineering | *WSO2*
>> *Tel:* +94 71 699 5861
>> <http://wso2.com/signature>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:05 PM Sanjeewa Malalgoda <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Can you please explain how are we planning to go ahead with this
>>> feature? Even now with ballerina we can create http2 client endpoint or
>>> server endpoint with http2 follows.
>>> If we do same now how will it work with existing filters?
>>>
>>> endpoint http:Listener testEP {
>>> port: 9095,
>>> httpVersion: "2.0"
>>> };
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> sanjeewa.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 5:13 PM Varuni Punchihewa <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all!
>>>> Please find my project description and the design as below.
>>>>
>>>> *Project description*
>>>>
>>>> The WSO2 API Microgateway currently supports only http and https as the
>>>> incoming and outgoing transport protocols. This project is for enabling it
>>>> to support HTTP2 for both incoming and outgoing message flows. We need to
>>>> evaluate the use of OAuth2.0, and rate limiting capabilities on the current
>>>> Microgateway and see how this impacts the move to HTTP2.
>>>>
>>>> *Solution Design*
>>>>
>>>>    - Supporting the messages received by the microgateway from the
>>>>    clients, by both HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2.0 protocols
>>>>    - All the communication that happen between the Microgateway and
>>>>    the Back end service will support HTTP/2.0 (The maximum version 
>>>> supported
>>>>    is set to 2.0. In case if it supports only 1.1, then it will be backward
>>>>    compatible to 1.1 and would not be a problem to communications)
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>> *Varuni Punchihewa*
>>>> Intern - Software Engineering | *WSO2*
>>>>
>>>> *Tel:* +94 71 699 5861
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Sanjeewa Malalgoda*
>>> Software Architect | Associate Director, Engineering - WSO2 Inc.
>>> (m) +94 712933253 | (e) [email protected] | (b) Blogger
>>> <http://sanjeewamalalgoda.blogspot.com>, Medium
>>> <https://medium.com/@sanjeewa190>
>>>
>>> GET INTEGRATION AGILE <https://wso2.com/signature>
>>> Integration Agility for Digitally Driven Business
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Architecture mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>
>>
>
> --
> *Sanjeewa Malalgoda*
> Software Architect | Associate Director, Engineering - WSO2 Inc.
> (m) +94 712933253 | (e) [email protected] | (b) Blogger
> <http://sanjeewamalalgoda.blogspot.com>, Medium
> <https://medium.com/@sanjeewa190>
>
> GET INTEGRATION AGILE <https://wso2.com/signature>
> Integration Agility for Digitally Driven Business
>


-- 
*Nuwan Dias* | Director | WSO2 Inc.
(m) +94 777 775 729 | (e) [email protected]
[image: Signature.jpg]
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to