On 26/02/2008, at 9:11 AM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
OK, this is just my personal opinion:
I think choice of Spring OSGi is influenced by a few things:
1) Archiva is looking to garner more contributions from the
community. Moving to Spring would, IMO, definately lessen the
learning curve. There is a comprehensive documentation and large
user base who work with Spring. Regards choice of Spring DM for
OSGi, you might want to have a look here:
http://static.springframework.org/osgi/docs/1.0/reference/html/why-spring-dm.html
Rahul is right.
We don't really have any requirement for the features of OSGi at this
time. Perhaps it would be useful as we add plugin support in a future
version though, and hopefully the Spring integration will be
sufficient at that point.
That said - Ludovic - if you see some way it might be of benefit and
are looking to contribute, by all means let us know :)
3) May be others can chip with their thoughts on Modello. But I
think Modello could be dropped by using JPA annotations for the data
model.
Yeah, that's not really related :)
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
