On Oct 2, 2009, at 7:35 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
There's no list in Felix. AFAIK, there's no open discussion about
discussing TCK issues. If there are such discussions, those are done
using back channels.
Yeah, this is what I wanted to avoid. I wanted a channel where
there's a record for others to review.
Is there a requirement from the OSGi Alliance to sign a NDA for
discussing TCK issues ? Non OSGi members can't have access to the
TCK, but this is a different matter.
I doubt it. I'll contact Richard to discuss status and alternatives.
I'll start this up on the [email protected] list
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 16:31, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Oct 2, 2009, at 7:27 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Oct 2, 2009, at 10:02 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Luckily there's a couple of Alliance members in this project who
can
perform this task until things get sorted out.
In any case we'll need a TCK mailing list; I'll get that done.
I'm not
sure how we'll vet membership. David, since you're a chair maybe
you could
provide a list?
There definitely needs to be a discussion if we are going to
create a TCK
mailing list that is not open to the entire community. I doubt
that I would
support such a mailing list...
You make a good point. How is this different that what Felix does?
Regards,
Alan
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
