On Jan 12, 2010, at 2:57 PM, David Jencks wrote: > Daytrader has a long history of insufficient maintenance and ad-hoc changes > to suit the demands of the moment, followed by no cleanup of all the broken > edges. IMO having an aries version of daytrader, the latest hot thing, > will mean that the ee version will be completely dead. I don't think this is > desirable. However, I'm not likely to work on any version of daytrader in > the forseeable future.
I don't disagree with your history of DayTrader. However, I doubt that the EE version dies, at least not right away. There is, and will continue to be a need for samples on both programming models. Assuming that's true, I think it's potentially confusing to end up with two different applications called "DayTrader". So, I'm wondering if there should be some separation, naming-wise... --kevan
