If a new name is really important I suggest AriesTrader. Alasdair
2010/1/13 Kevan Miller <[email protected]>: > > On Jan 12, 2010, at 2:57 PM, David Jencks wrote: > >> Daytrader has a long history of insufficient maintenance and ad-hoc changes >> to suit the demands of the moment, followed by no cleanup of all the broken >> edges. IMO having an aries version of daytrader, the latest hot thing, >> will mean that the ee version will be completely dead. I don't think this >> is desirable. However, I'm not likely to work on any version of daytrader >> in the forseeable future. > > I don't disagree with your history of DayTrader. However, I doubt that the EE > version dies, at least not right away. There is, and will continue to be a > need for samples on both programming models. Assuming that's true, I think > it's potentially confusing to end up with two different applications called > "DayTrader". So, I'm wondering if there should be some separation, > naming-wise... > > --kevan -- Alasdair Nottingham [email protected]
