Hi, I have created a JIRA ticket concerning doc improvement : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-132
Remark : Alternative is to wait IBM Redbook ;-) Regards, Charles Moulliard Senior Enterprise Architect Apache Camel Committer ***************************** blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard Linkedlin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard Apache Camel Group : http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=2447439&trk=anet_ug_hm On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:52 AM, zoe slattery <[email protected]>wrote: > Charles Moulliard wrote: > >> I would like to suggest that the documentation of the web site is updated >> in >> pararrel of making a realese. A tutorial is available for Blueprint but >> few >> info or nothing concerning JNDI (publising and retrieving a OSGI service >> (or >> blueprint service), JPA, Transaction and Web (@Resource, packaging). >> >> > Strongly agree. Specifically the blueprint tutorial is out of date > (ARIES-93), the blog sample needs documentation (ARIES-103). I suggest we > raise JIRAs for missing/inadequate docs and gate a release on resolving > them. > > Zoe > > Kind Regards, >> >> >> Charles Moulliard >> Senior Enterprise Architect >> Apache Camel Committer >> >> ***************************** >> blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >> twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard >> Linkedlin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard >> >> Apache Camel Group : >> http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=2447439&trk=anet_ug_hm >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Valentin Mahrwald < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> +1 for doing a release. >>> >>> As for the release version number, would this have any bearing on how we >>> version our package exports and bundles? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Valentin >>> >>> On 26 Jan 2010, at 17:34, Jeremy Hughes wrote: >>> >>> There's been a lot of activity lately so I'd like to propose we do a >>> >>> >>>> release so we can get some wider user feedback. I think we should give >>>> it a version of 0.1 and stick to versions <1 while we're in the >>>> Incubator. >>>> >>>> Then there is the question of whether to independently version the >>>> high level modules or keep them lock-step. For now I think we should >>>> keep them lock-step until we feel a need to change that. >>>> >>>> What does everyone think? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Jeremy >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > >
