Hi Joe, sorry I started setting myself up tuesday but am now out on vacation until monday.
Personally, I think the 0.1 release should serve to get what we have right now in the respectable form the ASF requires. So 'must haves' are to get the build in the right shape to create the distribution files that are acceptable to the IPMC. I think each main area of the code deserves at least a README to describe what's possible. Since this is the first release there are likely a few unknowns - w.r.t timing I hope/expect to get the release out this in feb. If there are particular JIRAs or other issues you feel should be included please say. I'd like to rename the current JIRA version 1.0 to 0.1 and target issues for 0.1 appropriately and issues not for 0.1 to target a new 0.2 version. WDYT? Cheers, Jeremy On 18 February 2010 15:39, Joe Bohn <[email protected]> wrote: > Jeremy, > > What are your current thoughts and goals regarding the release and potential > target dates? > > I think it would be good if you could summarize your thoughts in an email or > perhaps on a page in the wiki that we can keep updated as we make progress. > Of particular interest would be the content that we would like to see in > the first release (clarifying what we consider "must have" from "nice to > have"), the current status of that content, target dates for the release, > and the process that we plan to use to generate the release. > > Thanks, > Joe > > > > Jeremy Hughes wrote: >> >> On 12 February 2010 09:39, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Great, thanks a lot. Let us know if you need any help. >>> I guess if you take some notes, it would be interesting to put those >>> on the wiki. >> >> Certainly will. It's been a while since I did one and the process has >> changed quite a bit :-) >> >>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:32, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Kevan, thanks. I volunteer to be release manager. >>>> >>>> Jeremy >>>> >>>> On 11 February 2010 16:38, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Sounds like the consensus is for a release with all components at a 0.1 >>>>> version number. Best to start with a simple versioning scheme, IMO. >>>>> Personally, I don't view a 0.1 blueprint release as an issue. >>>>> >>>>> Showing the ability to generate an Apache release is an important step >>>>> for the community. Would definitely like to see this happen... >>>>> >>>>> We'll need a release manager. Any volunteers? >>>>> >>>>> --kevan >>>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Guillaume Nodet >>> ------------------------ >>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>> ------------------------ >>> Open Source SOA >>> http://fusesource.com >>> >> > > > -- > Joe >
