Sandbox sounds fine to me. Should I also move the SPI Fly component to the sandbox? Since that one's experimental too...
Cheers, David On 23 February 2010 02:58, Joe Bohn <[email protected]> wrote: > > Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> >> Yeah, I agree. What about put it in a sandbox area for now if you >> want to experiment and move it to trunk after the release? > > +1 - the sandbox seems to work well for other apache projects. Alternatively > I guess we could continue to use the contrib location for this purpose. > > Joe > > >> >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:52, Alasdair Nottingham <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Given that we are trying to do a release at the moment this makes me >>> wonder how we should differentiate things which are experimental and >>> wouldn't be part of the release, and things which are to be part of >>> the release. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> Alasdair >>> >>> On 22 February 2010 11:00, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> In the OSGi Alliance we're currently working on defining 'Asynchronous >>>> Distributed OSGi' in various forms and what that might look like. >>>> Currently the work is divided up into three areas: >>>> * Bringing JMS to OSGi >>>> * Message Driven Components >>>> * Asynchronous Services >>>> We're really at the requirements gathering stage right now... >>>> >>>> In the mean time I'm looking for a place where we can do some >>>> experimentation and collaboration in the area in order to get a better >>>> understanding of these problems and potential solutions. I would love >>>> to start a component in Aries for this purpose. >>>> The three areas identified above are more or less orthogonal, but I >>>> can see many cases where they are combined, so at least initially I >>>> think a single experimentation area for them would be good. >>>> Then, when the dust settles a bit we might extract a number of >>>> independent components... Anyway, that's at least how I think we could >>>> do it, but I would also have no big issues with three separate >>>> experimentation areas (or maybe three submodules of an async top-level >>>> module would be a middle ground). >>>> >>>> Anyway, if people think this is a good idea I can start putting some >>>> of the structure in the build system over the coming few days... >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> David >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Alasdair Nottingham >>> [email protected] >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > Joe >
