Ok, I guess this thread got obsoleted by the Aries Release thread a little :)

Once the buildsystem refactor is done as suggested on that thread,
there shouldn't really be a need to do experimental components in the
sandbox, right? Or do people feel strongly that they should? I guess I
would prefer the main trunk as they would then also be included in the
hudson builds etc...

Thanks,

David

On 23 February 2010 17:49, Joe Bohn <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> me too
>
> Joe
>
> Alasdair Nottingham wrote:
>>
>> Makes sense to me.
>>
>> Alasdair
>>
>> On 23 Feb 2010, at 15:04, David Bosschaert <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sandbox sounds fine to me.
>>> Should I also move the SPI Fly component to the sandbox? Since that
>>> one's experimental too...
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> On 23 February 2010 02:58, Joe Bohn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I agree.  What about put it in a sandbox area for now if you
>>>>> want to experiment and move it to trunk after the release?
>>>>
>>>> +1 - the sandbox seems to work well for other apache projects.
>>>> Alternatively
>>>> I guess we could continue to use the contrib location for this purpose.
>>>>
>>>> Joe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:52, Alasdair Nottingham <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Given that we are trying to do a release at the moment this makes me
>>>>>> wonder how we should differentiate things which are experimental and
>>>>>> wouldn't be part of the release, and things which are to be part of
>>>>>> the release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>> Alasdair
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 22 February 2010 11:00,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the OSGi Alliance we're currently working on defining
>>>>>>> 'Asynchronous
>>>>>>> Distributed OSGi' in various forms and what that might look like.
>>>>>>> Currently the work is divided up into three areas:
>>>>>>> * Bringing JMS to OSGi
>>>>>>> * Message Driven Components
>>>>>>> * Asynchronous Services
>>>>>>> We're really at the requirements gathering stage right now...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the mean time I'm looking for a place where we can do some
>>>>>>> experimentation and collaboration in the area in order to get a
>>>>>>> better
>>>>>>> understanding of these problems and potential solutions. I would love
>>>>>>> to start a component in Aries for this purpose.
>>>>>>> The three areas identified above are more or less orthogonal, but I
>>>>>>> can see many cases where they are combined, so at least initially I
>>>>>>> think a single experimentation area for them would be good.
>>>>>>> Then, when the dust settles a bit we might extract a number of
>>>>>>> independent components... Anyway, that's at least how I think we
>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>> do it, but I would also have no big issues with three separate
>>>>>>> experimentation areas (or maybe three submodules of an async
>>>>>>> top-level
>>>>>>> module would be a middle ground).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyway, if people think this is a good idea I can start putting some
>>>>>>> of the structure in the build system over the coming few days...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alasdair Nottingham
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Joe
>>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Joe
>

Reply via email to