OK, I've caught up with my mail. I see David Jenck's objection on ARIES-230.

Cheers,
Jeremy

On 9 March 2010 21:41, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9 March 2010 18:43, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> wrote:
>> My understanding is that there is a technical veto on this change.  More
>> specifically the proper name of the plugin should be eba-maven-plugin and
>> *not* maven-eba-plugin.
>
> Are you saying that you veto this change? If so could you justify why
> you think it should be eba-maven-plugin and not maven-eba-plugin. We
> have maven-bundle-plugin, maven-jar-plugin, maven-zip-plugin and
> maven-assembly-plugin for collecting files up into an archive. An eba
> is an archive too and calling it maven-eba-plugin would seem to
> exactly follow the precedent already set. I'm sure you must have a
> reason, but I'm missing it right now.
>
> Cheers,
> Jeremy
>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>> On Mar 9, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> Graham just renamed the plugin to fall in line with other plugins. So
>>> it is no longer called eba-maven-plugin. There is a snapshot of the
>>> plugin deployed to the snapshot repo so it should be picked up.
>>> However, you can work around this by first building the parent top
>>> level module then build the maven-eba-plugin module. Then you can go
>>> back to the top level and build everything.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>> On 9 March 2010 15:33, David Bosschaert <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I just created a fresh new Aries checkout today but it fails to build:
>>>> [INFO]
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
>>>> [INFO]
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> [INFO] The plugin 'org.apache.aries:maven-eba-plugin' does not exist or
>>>> no valid
>>>>  version could be found
>>>>
>>>> I also see that Hudson's been red for a number of days:
>>>> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Aries/
>>>>
>>>> Whats going on?
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to