On Mar 9, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
If so could you justify why
you think it should be eba-maven-plugin and not maven-eba-plugin. We
have maven-bundle-plugin, maven-jar-plugin, maven-zip-plugin and
maven-assembly-plugin for collecting files up into an archive. An eba
is an archive too and calling it maven-eba-plugin would seem to
exactly follow the precedent already set.
From the mojo-dev group:
On Mar 9, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Here at Mojo we use $name-maven-plugin to distinguish our plugins
from
the plugins that come from the Maven project.
On 2010-03-09 22:43, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
What's the standard naming convention?
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/maven-%24name-plugin-or-%24name-maven-plugin-artifactId-tp27842424p27842580.html
