On 24 March 2010 19:19, Joe Bohn <[email protected]> wrote: > Jeremy Hughes wrote: >> >> Hi Don, I think we're close. I had wanted to get artifacts up to vote >> on this week. I guess the open jpa release vote closes 2am GMT >> Saturday and those fixes for Aries JPA issues are OPENJPA-1491 and >> OPENJPA-1524 right? There are workaround for both the 1491 workaround >> is in Aries itself so that wouldn't affect users, the workaround for >> 1524 mentioned by Joe is a change to a blueprint.xml so impacts users. >> >> Ideally I'd like to pull in beta3. Anyone else have a preference? > > I agree that we should pull in beta3 and drop the work-around. > > I'd also like to point out that we are still using a SNAPSHOT version of the > maven-bundle-plugin (2.1.0-SNAPSHOT) and, as Guillaume mentioned in a recent > post - there are still changes being made to this plugin. We would need an > official release of this plugin before we could make an Aries release.
OK, so what's the rule here w.r.t using SNAPSHOTS when you release? Is it: users shouldn't be expected to use SNAPSHOTs of depedencies. Or is it: people who want to build the code themselves shouldn't be expected to have to download SNAPSHOTs. If the former then maven-bundle-plugin can be a SNAPSHOT right? mvn release:prepare asks this: There are still some remaining snapshot dependencies.: Do you want to resolve them now? (yes/no) no: : yes Dependency type to resolve,: specify the selection number ( 0:All 1:Project Dependencies 2:Plugins 3:Reports 4:Extensions ): (0/1/2/3) 1: : is it ok release if you accept the default of 1? > Is > this something that you are working on Guillaume? > > > Joe > > >> >> Cheers, >> Jeremy >> >> There I think it's worth waiting that little bit extra for it so the >> 1524 workaround isn't needed >> >> On 24 March 2010 02:39, Donald Woods <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> What's the status on a release? I've just put a openjpa-2.0.0-beta3 up >>> for a vote, which includes fixes for two Aries JPA issues.... >>> >>> >>> -Donald >>> >>> >>> On 1/26/10 12:34 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: >>>> >>>> There's been a lot of activity lately so I'd like to propose we do a >>>> release so we can get some wider user feedback. I think we should give >>>> it a version of 0.1 and stick to versions <1 while we're in the >>>> Incubator. >>>> >>>> Then there is the question of whether to independently version the >>>> high level modules or keep them lock-step. For now I think we should >>>> keep them lock-step until we feel a need to change that. >>>> >>>> What does everyone think? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Jeremy >>>> >> > > > -- > Joe >
