On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 15:41, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 25 March 2010 14:34, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > > No, it's not. We should never release anything with a snapshot > dependency. > > That would make the build much more likely to not succeed in the future, > as > > snapshots are meant to be deleted from repositories from time to time. > > Do you mean if you wanted to rebuild a released Aries sources.zip? If > so then I can see that. > Well, keep in mind that at Apache, *the official release* is the source distribution, not prebuilt binaries that are provided for ease of consumption. > > > > > FWIW, I could try to release the new maven bundle plugin next week or so. > > That would be great thanks! > > > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 15:21, Jeremy Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 24 March 2010 19:19, Joe Bohn <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Jeremy Hughes wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi Don, I think we're close. I had wanted to get artifacts up to vote > >> >> on this week. I guess the open jpa release vote closes 2am GMT > >> >> Saturday and those fixes for Aries JPA issues are OPENJPA-1491 and > >> >> OPENJPA-1524 right? There are workaround for both the 1491 workaround > >> >> is in Aries itself so that wouldn't affect users, the workaround for > >> >> 1524 mentioned by Joe is a change to a blueprint.xml so impacts > users. > >> >> > >> >> Ideally I'd like to pull in beta3. Anyone else have a preference? > >> > > >> > I agree that we should pull in beta3 and drop the work-around. > >> > > >> > I'd also like to point out that we are still using a SNAPSHOT version > of > >> the > >> > maven-bundle-plugin (2.1.0-SNAPSHOT) and, as Guillaume mentioned in a > >> recent > >> > post - there are still changes being made to this plugin. We would > need > >> an > >> > official release of this plugin before we could make an Aries release. > >> > >> OK, so what's the rule here w.r.t using SNAPSHOTS when you release? Is > >> it: users shouldn't be expected to use SNAPSHOTs of depedencies. Or is > >> it: people who want to build the code themselves shouldn't be expected > >> to have to download SNAPSHOTs. If the former then maven-bundle-plugin > >> can be a SNAPSHOT right? > >> > >> mvn release:prepare asks this: > >> > >> There are still some remaining snapshot dependencies.: Do you want to > >> resolve them now? (yes/no) no: : yes > >> Dependency type to resolve,: specify the selection number ( 0:All > >> 1:Project Dependencies 2:Plugins 3:Reports 4:Extensions ): (0/1/2/3) > >> 1: : > >> > >> is it ok release if you accept the default of 1? > >> > >> > Is > >> > this something that you are working on Guillaume? > >> > > >> > > >> > Joe > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Cheers, > >> >> Jeremy > >> >> > >> >> There I think it's worth waiting that little bit extra for it so the > >> >> 1524 workaround isn't needed > >> >> > >> >> On 24 March 2010 02:39, Donald Woods <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> What's the status on a release? I've just put a openjpa-2.0.0-beta3 > up > >> >>> for a vote, which includes fixes for two Aries JPA issues.... > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> -Donald > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On 1/26/10 12:34 PM, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> There's been a lot of activity lately so I'd like to propose we do > a > >> >>>> release so we can get some wider user feedback. I think we should > give > >> >>>> it a version of 0.1 and stick to versions <1 while we're in the > >> >>>> Incubator. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Then there is the question of whether to independently version the > >> >>>> high level modules or keep them lock-step. For now I think we > should > >> >>>> keep them lock-step until we feel a need to change that. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> What does everyone think? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Thanks, > >> >>>> Jeremy > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Joe > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Guillaume Nodet > > ------------------------ > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > ------------------------ > > Open Source SOA > > http://fusesource.com > > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
