On an additional note, Steven, ARIN does not change RFCs...That is done by the RFC-Editor and usually through the IETF process.
Owen On Jun 4, 2013, at 15:34 , John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Steven Ryerse <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> John, you are right but when high level RFC changes are contemplated maybe >> polling all of the organizations listed in the ARIN database for comments is >> the proper thing to do. After all Legacy Holder allocations were made under >> those RFCs et al. > > Steven - > > Polling any subset of the community runs a very real risk of bias in the > resulting input, > and since affected parties are more than those who were issued > resources, it is best > if those with an interest in number resource policy make their view > known. > > Note that many resource holders simply wish to use their IP number > resources; i.e. > they requested and received their resources and wish to be unmolested > but simply > use those resources in peace, and ARIN contacting all resource holders > for each new > draft policy would quickly rise to the level of being perceived as > "spam"... > > Thanks, > /John > > John Curran > President and CEO > ARIN > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
