On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Jimmy Hess <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I am in favor of needs basis being deprecated for IPv6, and newer > more appropriately sized number resource pools, and replaced with > something else that will provide conservation. > > I think the better question is, what are we trying to preserve in IPv6. Raw address space? No point for the forseeable future (40+ year protocol lifetime? ...) Routing table growth? ... Yes. Complexity of allocations? Arguably yes. I am not in a position to do the calcs due to not knowing where all the raw data is, but to me it would be useful to see what sizes we might consider giving to ISPs and to independent multihomed entities such that it is unlikely that either of those organization types would ever need another allocation; what does that do to estimated lifetime of the address space, and what does that do to routing table growth models? -- -george william herbert [email protected]
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
