On 6/7/13, Chris Grundemann <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) Do you support the principle of efficient utilization based on need > (Conservation/Sustainability)?
I say No; opposed to efficient utilization based on need as a principal. I don't say no to Conservation/Sustainability, but you lumped them in there, thus creating a biased question; efficient need is not required for sustainability. > 2) Do you support the principle of hierarchical aggregation (Routability)? No, I do not support hierarchical aggregation as an RIR principal. I do support routability of assignments and allocations as a RIR principal. Again, two unrelated topics have been confounded, in the question. I do favor hierarchical aggregation for IPv6 resources, but not for IPv4 resources, AS numbers, or other resources where it doesn't make sense -- hierarchical aggregation does not belong in the list of principals. > 3) Do you support the principle of uniqueness (Registration)? Yes. This is the fundamental purpose of ARIN and the RIRs; this is invariant, and, therefore, it should be a principal. > 4) Do you support the goal of balancing these principles with each > other under the overarching principle of Stewardship? Principals should not require balancing. Stewardship needs to be defined more clearly, and more specifically, to ensure it is understood what stewardship means, and that its scope and possible interpretation is appropriately restricted. > Thanks, > ~Chris -- -JH _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
