On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Milton L Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> >> 1) Do you support the principle of efficient utilization based on need >> (Conservation/Sustainability)? > > [Milton L Mueller] Chris, as you know, conservation needs to be detached from > needs assessments. One can have efficient utilization and conservation > without needs assessments, once a free pool is fully occupied and transfers > of resources take place via the market.
That is not something that I know Milton, it is something you assert. Thank you for taking the time to provide your opinion here, but let's remember that it is your opinion. Cheers, ~Chris > Also, efficient utilization and conservation are distinct concepts. Once you > bundle all these concepts together it is not really clear what people are > supporting when they say the support it. > >> 2) Do you support the principle of hierarchical aggregation >> (Routability)? > > [Milton L Mueller] Again, routability and hierarchical aggregation are > distinct concepts, one could support one without supporting the other. Also, > there are longstanding claims that ARIN does not guarantee routability. To > make this clearer, just remove the "routability" term from this question. But > generally, I think hierarchical aggregation is a Good Thing, especially in > the IPv6 context. > >> 3) Do you support the principle of uniqueness (Registration)? > > [Milton L Mueller] Yes. I also think it should be the top priority. > >> 4) Do you support the goal of balancing these principles with each other >> under the overarching principle of Stewardship? > > [Milton L Mueller] No. I am not opposed in principle to stewardship I just > consider what you've written above to be a meaningless statement. > >> Please feel free to provide your thoughts on each of these items as >> general principles. Please state a definitive support or do not support >> for each individual principle/goal and provide a brief rational for that >> position. For now I'd like to ask that we evaluate the principles >> generally - and not to argue with each others opinions but simply to >> each state our own. Once we have a sense of the community support, we >> can then dig into specific text for each item based on the level of >> support and the rationale behind that level of support. >> >> This will be very helpful as we decide our next steps with this draft >> policy. >> >> Thanks, >> ~Chris >> >> -- >> @ChrisGrundemann >> http://chrisgrundemann.com >> _______________________________________________ >> PPML >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN >> Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml >> Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. -- @ChrisGrundemann http://chrisgrundemann.com _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
