On 7/11/13 9:26 AM, cb.list6 wrote: > Who would benefit from hoarding? Many.
> Hoarding seems like economic "dumping", there are rules and policies > around it, but it has never really occured because the economics are > wrong. The market ensures dumping does not occur. Before embarking on a law and economics discourse it would be useful if you could suggest you are capable of conducting it to a conclusion consistent with your initial offerings, informed by and answering adequately critical commentary. > Or like the FUD about walmart driving local business out and then > jacking up prices after competition is gone, its just fud. People made > a big noise about it 20 years ago, not any more. Could we not segway from a range of ints to some other subject. > I think the market is only interestes in transactions. Ipv4 addresses > are like most cars, they depreciate rapidly so hoarding is not a real > thing. Thought is nice, proof is better. There are numbers, they go the other way. > And, with google fiber at 77% ipv6 and vzw over 25%, i must say i > would no hoard ipv4. The relevance of your point of view may have local scope. > But, my ask is, lets not assume hoarding or threats to ipv4 by bad > actors unless there is a real case that applies. Fine. A condition previously met. > Afaik, arin brought transfers in to increase efficiency Possibly, though efficiency in what is open to interpretation. Eric _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
