You're right John. Bill, I apologize for calling you a smart ass. The draft describes desirable states, not a belief system. Bill defined the former as goals and the latter as principles. Bill then cleverly and deliberately mischaracterized my comment that, if that's so, the draft should be relabelled with the correct word: goals.
Clearly I was wrong to view Bill's 'ditching principles' response as a smart-ass remark. And even if it was, it was unforgivably rude for me to have said so. Regards, Bill Herrin On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Sweeting, John <[email protected]> wrote: > Bill Herrin, you are totally out of line here. Please clean it up, there > is no excuse for your rudeness below. Period. > > On 7/10/13 8:47 AM, "William Herrin" <[email protected]> wrote: >>On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Bill Darte <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:55 PM, William Herrin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Then perhaps we should ditch the word "principles" and stick with >>>> "goals" like RFC 2050 did. >> >>> I think in this world, the ditching of principles has always proven to >>>be a >>> poor choice. -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
