On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Jason Schiller <[email protected]> wrote: > In that case can you be a little more explicit? > > I have always felt like ISP have a different need than end-sites, and > understood the divergence > in policy for the two. > > For example, and ISP should be forced to document when it makes an > assignment to a customer, > The same requirement doesn't apply to a University who is assigning space to > the philosophy department.
Hi Jason, Why not? Perhaps not the philosophy department, but why shouldn't addresses assigned for use by students in the dorms be treated the same as ISP assignments to their customers? Why does one class of registrant get to treat its assignments to customer equipment one way while another class of registrants has it harder? Why don't we have one class of customer with two rule sets: report your internal use this way, report your assignments to customer equipment that way. Would that not be more fair? > What differences between ISPs and end-sites do you think are unfair. Votes, for one thing. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
