On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Owen DeLong wrote:
I oppose the change. Anyone inclined to abuse a two participant standard
can easily create or obtain a 3rd participant for said purpose. This is
literally a case of change for the sake of change. No, a 3 participant
minimum is not an unreasonable standard. However, since it does have
some negative impact and is utterly unlikely to be at all effective in
deterring abuse, I see no benefit to the change.
I agree with Owen on all points and oppose the policy change. Most
importantly, this policy change significantly raises the bar for a
legitimate IXP to get started while doing nothing effective to prevent what
is, effectively, a tiny amount of potential abuse.
--
Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM: BrandonNRoss
+1-404-635-6667 ICQ: 2269442
Skype: brandonross
Schedule a meeting: http://www.doodle.com/bross
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
