On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Heather Schiller <[email protected]> wrote: > I am opposed to the policy because of this line " IXP's formed as non > profits will be considered end user organizations. All others will be > considered ISPs." > > This statement will impact the overwhelming majority of Critical > Infrastructure assignment holders, the majority of which are not IX's. The > goal of attempting preservation should be done by how the allocation is > justified, not how much the entity is billed. 111 of the CI allocations > are not to IX's. Of the 66 IX allocations it is nearly split between end > users and ISP's.
Hi Heather, Read it in context. The draft replaces only one of five paragraphs in section 4.4. The paragraph replaced and its replacement address only IXPs, not other providers of critical infrastructure. https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four4 Nevertheless, would your objection be solved if "All others" was replaced with "All other IXPs"? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ [email protected] [email protected] 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
