On Feb 9, 2014 8:05 PM, "Matthew Kaufman" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2/8/2014 6:19 AM, William Herrin wrote: >> >> If we want to manage addresses this way, we should first endeavor to pass a globally coordinated policy to the effect that multiregional organizations should solicit the registry in their headquarters' region for all registry-direct number resources rather than soliciting the registry that serves the region where the resources are employed. > > > I have a better idea: > > For IPv4, realize that really really soon, this isn't going to matter. > > For IPv6, realize that it almost never matters. > > I have no problem with someone getting a nice big IPv6 block from one convenient local RIR, and then splitting it up across their multinational organization however they see fit. If they plan well, they *never* come back to *any* RIR for address space. > > Meanwhile, why are we still discussing IPv4 policy at all? > > Matthew Kaufman > >
100% agree with Matthew on both points. CB > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
