(As long as ARIN transfer policy requires justified need according to the same requirements as for new allocations from the free pool...)
This change would clarify/codify that organizations with out-of-region network needs are allowed to register transfers in the ARIN database. It would mean that organizations could choose between an inter-RIR transfer (if allowed in their region), or obtaining an intra-ARIN transfer and using (some of) it out of the ARIN region. If that sounds problematic to any of you, you should consider why previous efforts to disallow out-of-region use of ARIN addresses have failed to gain consensus. You should also address the fact that such out-of-region use is de facto allowed today. -Scott On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Matthew Kaufman <[email protected]>wrote: > On 2/10/2014 9:47 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote: > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> Meanwhile, why are we still discussing IPv4 policy at all? >>> >> Because the transfer market for Ipv4 is going to be around for at least >> another 10 years. >> >> > And how will this policy impact the transfer market? > > Matthew Kaufman > > _______________________________________________ > PPML > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues. >
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
