On Mar 21, 2014, at 2:56 PM, David Conrad <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2014, at 11:47 AM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Also, I believe ARIN is the wrong place for such constraints. I believe >>> operators should make the decision on such matters >> >> I also believe that operators should set such constraints (if desired), > > They do. It's called "prefix length filters". Indeed... They can individually decide which routes to accept, and that may be deemed sufficient by the community such that nothing is needed in ARIN number resource policy (or not) >> by participation in the regional policy development process. > > Out of curiosity, what percentage of ASes being announced on the Internet > participate in ARIN regional policy development processes? 100% of those who are interested in doing so, just all of those who are interested may participate in the ICANN DNS registry consensus policy development... You may want to use your domain name any way you want, but you are still bound the DNS registry consensus policies, even if you opted not to participate in their development - <http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/consensus-policies> Out of curiosity, do you know what percentage of domain name holders participate in the ICANN consensus policy development processes? The entire Internet identifier registry system is based on community- based policy development, and while not everyone participates, the key point is making sure that everyone has the ability to do so. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
