The analysis by David is, in my opinion, correct. This policy proposal is receiving what in my experience is an unprecedented amount of community support, _AS_WRITTEN_. Changes to the text require support be reiterated, which might be unwanted and harmful to the text speed of the process. Further desired changes should be submitted separately to avoid interfering with the momentum that has been generated.

The community is speaking and the AC is listening. What I am hearing is get busy and get 'er done. If the policy proposal can be supported as written, it should be. Any changes to the text as written will have to be listened to and responded to and cannot speed things up.

I am _NOT_ saying do not dissent, only that the conversation that ensues will take time.

Not to put words in Marty's mouth, but that is how I interpret what he is saying.

John Springer

On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, David Huberman wrote:


Derek,

 

Marty can be a bit gruff - it's part of his charm :)  He's actually trying very 
hard to help you achieve your goals.  His observation you quoted is borne of 
wisdom of
dealing with the policy process for many years.   Some may agree, or may not 
agree.  I happened to agree strongly with him.

 

Owen's proposal, without modifications (or at least, not the one proposed so 
far), has the best chance of succeeding, and doing so quickly.

 

Just my opinion.

 

/david

David R Huberman
Microsoft Corporation
Senior IT/OPS Program Manager (GFS)

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Derek 
Calanchini <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 6:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Policy Proposal: Reduce all Minimum 
Allocation/Assignment units to /24  
Martin,

You seem very negative about this, disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing is 
counter productive.  Perhaps you could explain your concerns giving actual 
reasons,
potential fallout, issues, etc in the hopes of making it better....

 Best regards,

   Derek Calanchini
   Owner
   Creative Network Solutions
   Phone: 916-852-2890
   Fax: 916-852-2899

"Adopt the metric system!"

CNS LOGO
On 4/29/2014 5:15 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:

Owens change is simple and fast. Meddling beyond that is asking for trouble.  
It's a no op. Leave it alone. 
Bring that to the PPC at NANOG and this is dead. 





On Tuesday, April 29, 2014, Jimmy Hess <[email protected]> wrote:
      On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Owen DeLong <[email protected]> wrote:

      I support the proposed change as written.

      In addition,  since Multihomed ISPs no longer have a different minimum
      allocation, I suggest    removing the distinction between Multihomed
      and non-Multihomed ISPs:

         o 4.2.1.5     Delete the sentence that says "For multihomed ISPs...."
         Remove multi-homed distinction and requirements for initial
      allocations to ISPs.
            o Delete section  4.2.2.1  Standard or non-multihomed  and 
subsections.

            o Rename section 4.2.2.2 to  remove references to Multihomed

      Prepend     "When requesting a  /24,  demonstrate the efficient
      utilization of a minimum contiguous or non-contiguous  /27  (two /28s)
      from an upstream."

      [Regardless if multihomed or not]



      > Template: ARIN-POLICY-PROPOSAL-TEMPLATE-3.0
      >
      > 1. Policy Proposal Name: Reduce all Minimum Allocation/Assignment units 
to
      > /24
      > 2. Proposal Originator
      > a. name: Owen DeLong
      > b. email: [email protected]
      > c. telephone: 408-890-7992
      > d. organization: Hurricane Electric
      > 3. Date: 29 April, 2014
      > 4. Problem Statement:
      >
      > As we approach runout, more and more end users and smaller ISPs will be
      > unable to obtain space from their upstreams and will be seeking space 
from
      > ARIN. In order to meet these needs to the extent possible and to make 
policy
      > more fair to a broader range of the ARIN constituency, we should reduce 
the
      > minimum assignment and allocation units to /24 across the board.
      >
      > 5. Policy statement:
      >
      > Change the minimum allocation and assignment unit for all IPv4 single 
and
      > multi homed instances to /20. This would include:
      >
      >
      > 4.2.1.5 Change all occurrences of /20 and /22 to /24
      >
      > 4.2.2.1.1 Change all occurrences of /20 to /24, and change 16 /24s to 1 
/24.
      > Remove the example about 12 /24s.
      >
      > 4.3.2.1 Change both occurrences of /20 to /24
      >
      > 4.9 Change /22 to /24
      >
      > 4.9.1 Change all instances of /22 to /24. Remove the reference to 4 
/24s.
      >
      >
      > 6. Comments:
      > a. Timetable for implementation: Immediate, possibly through board 
action.
      > b. Anything else
      >
      > END OF TEMPLATE
      >
      >
      >
      > _______________________________________________
      > PPML
      > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
      > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
      > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
      > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
      > Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.



      --
      -JH
      _______________________________________________
      PPML
      You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
      the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
      Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
      http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
      Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.



_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.




_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
[avast-mail-stamp.png]

This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.



_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to