On Jun 6, 2014, at 8:06 AM, Milton L Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: > Why is it "fair" to force a willing seller and a willing buyer to submit to > an additional step…?
“Fair” is not a word that I’d use in this context. I would, however, say that
the additional regulatory check is “necessary” when a transaction imposes
externalities upon third parties. Because of scarcity, routing-table bloat,
and the public interest in availability of addresses for public communication,
the externalities of most, if not all, IP address transactions are very broadly
distributed.
Good regulation preserves the public interest where that differs from private
interests.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
