On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Steven Ryerse <[email protected]> wrote: > > Its more complicated than that. I’ve submitted the proposed policy change > below to the AC. Obviously at this early stage I don’t know if the Community > will accept this or not but 2014-13 complicates this proposal.
I appears to me that your objection to this proposal is essentially IFF your proposed policy change to remove needs testing is accepted by the community, that accepting this proposal as written will mean you could only get a /24 without proving needs, rather than something larger. Is that the essence of your objection? If not, please be explicit, since I am not getting it. I would propose that if your goal is to be able to get a /22 (or whatever it is) every year without needs testing that you make that explicit in your new proposal. That way, the proposals are not interlinked in either way, and each can stand on their own merits, and the agenda's are (more) clearly marketed. Thanks. Gary _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
