Gary’s suggestion notwithstanding, if 2014-13 goes thru and then my proposal
were to go thru, all that would have been accomplished would be that a /24
could be allocated without needs tests once per year. While that would
slightly better than it is today, a /24 will only help the smallest of
Organizations. I don’t want to see the Organizations that need the size of a
/22 or a /24 to find it harder to get an allocation because of 2014-13 and if
the needs test remain that is exactly what would happen.
As I’ve said many times before the existing policies are stacked against small
Organizations and I’m trying to remedy the inequity of that. In my view
2014-13 in its current form makes the problem worse and not better and I cannot
support it in its current form. I would however support it if the language is
changed to use a range of /20 down to /24 where the current policy says /20,
and a range of /22 down to a /24 where the current policy says a /22.
John I think it would be a great thing for you and the board to finally
acknowledge that it is harder for a small Organization to get an allocation
than larger ones and it is inherently unfair - and this Community need to
address that inequity.
Steven Ryerse
President
100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA 30338
www.eclipse-networks.com
770.656.1460 - Cell
770.399.9099- Office
[Description: Description: Eclipse Networks Logo_small.png]℠ Eclipse Networks,
Inc.
Conquering Complex Networks℠
From: John Curran [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 2:54 PM
To: Steven Ryerse
Cc: Kevin Blumberg; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN 2014-13
On Jul 13, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Steven Ryerse
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Its more complicated than that. I’ve submitted the proposed policy change
below to the AC. Obviously at this early stage I don’t know if the Community
will accept this or not but 2014-13 complicates this proposal.
Steven -
That may be the case (that 2014-13 would complicate your policy proposal),
but that is not
equivalent to "making it harder for Organizations to get blocks that are
larger than a /24".
As far as the staff can determine, 2014-13 will not impact ability for
parties to obtain larger
blocks, as the established criteria and guidelines for initial requests
larger than /24 will still
be used. It would definitely allow issuance of address space (of /24 size)
to organizations
that would presently not qualify under current number resource policy.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
